In class I had the privilege of watching a mock trial of the famous Board of Regents v Bakke Case. This is what I learned from this mock trial:
Board of Regents v. Bakke was a landmark Supreme Court case that was decided in 1978. The case arose from a dispute over a University of California medical school's affirmative action admissions program, which set aside a certain number of seats for minority applicants. Allan Bakke, a white applicant, was twice rejected by the school and argued that the program violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Bakke, holding that the university's admissions program was unconstitutional because it imposed a "strict racial quota" on applicants. The Court emphasized the importance of ensuring that public institutions provide equal opportunities to all individuals, regardless of their race or ethnicity.
The decision in Board of Regents v. Bakke has had a significant impact on the use of affirmative action in higher education. While the Court upheld the constitutionality of affirmative action programs in general, it placed strict limits on the way such programs can be designed and implemented.
In reflection, the Court's ruling in Board of Regents v. Bakke can be seen as both a victory for equality and a limitation on the ability of institutions to address past discrimination and promote diversity. The decision made it clear that public institutions must take race and ethnicity into account in a narrowly tailored manner, in order to avoid the creation of racial quotas or other forms of discrimination. At the same time, the ruling also made it more difficult for institutions to implement affirmative action programs that are effective in achieving their goals.
Sources:
In Class Mock Trial



Comments
Post a Comment