Harlan began his dissent by pointing out the history of discrimination against black Americans. He noted that, even after the Civil War and the abolition of slavery, African Americans continued to face discrimination and oppression. He argued that segregation laws, which required black and white Americans to use separate facilities, were a continuation of this discrimination.
Harlan then went on to explain why he believed segregation was unconstitutional. He argued that the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees equal protection under the law, prohibited the government from treating people differently based on their race. Segregation laws, he argued, did just that. They treated black Americans as second-class citizens, and thus violated the Constitution.
Furthermore, Harlan pointed out that segregation was not only unconstitutional, but also harmful to society. He argued that it perpetuated the idea of white superiority and black inferiority, and that it encouraged racial animosity and conflict. He believed that segregation was a moral and social evil, and that it had no place in a just and equitable society.
In conclusion, Harlan's dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson was a powerful and eloquent statement against segregation. He argued that it was unconstitutional, harmful to society, and contrary to the principles of equality and justice. His dissent was later cited in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education, which overturned the "separate but equal" doctrine and paved the way for the Civil Rights movement.
Sources:
Harlan's Great Dissent - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law Library, https://louisville.edu/law/library/special-collections/the-john-marshall-harlan-collection/harlans-great-dissent.
“Justice Harlan's Imperishable Dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson.” RSS, https://www.thinkwy.org/post/justice-harlans-imperishable-dissent-in-plessy-v-ferguson.
“Plessy v. Ferguson.” Legal Information Institute, Legal Information Institute, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/163/537.


Comments
Post a Comment